Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Learning to love vultures in order to save them

Many people associate vultures with death and decay. But a couple of conservationists in South Africa are trying to show the public what they love and admire about these birds in order to try to save them.

"No one's going to try to save a species if they don't love them," said Kerri Wolter.

Wolter and partner Walter Neser run the Vulture Programme, where visitors can see the birds as they do ? as loyal mates, devoted parents and resourceful foragers, as well as spectacular fliers. Visitors to the Vulture Programme, a 25-acre plot with spectacular views of the Magaliesberg Mountains near Johannesburg, can observe the birds feeding at "vulture restaurants" where they dine on carrion, and get close to a Cape vulture breeding colony located on an artificial cliff made from mesh, concrete and paint.

The Cape vulture, with its 8 ? foot wingspan, creamy feathers and golden eyes, is southern Africa's only native vulture. South Africa has the largest population of breeding Cape vultures with about 2,400 pairs, but their habitats are threatened by human encroachment and the species is listed as vulnerable. Neighboring Namibia, where the bird is listed as critically endangered, is believed to have only about a dozen wild breeding pairs left.

This time of year, visitors to the Vulture Programme can watch the birds dining and will see young birds on the verge of flight. During the Southern Hemisphere spring, in September and October, visitors might glimpse a pair of adult birds brooding over an egg. While the scene looks natural, it is the result of painstaking human intervention.

To ensure as many successful hatchings as possible, Wolter and Neser remove the eggs from adults pairs, which mate for life, soon after they are laid, and replace them with wooden dummies.

The real eggs spend most of the 54-day incubation period in a kitchen in an old farmhouse near the large bird enclosures. When the chick is ready to hatch, signaled by the sound of tapping from within the egg, Wolter takes over the role of hen. She has spent hours tapping and pulling at shells with surgical clamps, and uses a syringe to dampen the feathers of the emerging bird with a solution resembling a mother bird's saliva.

In the wild, when overeager parents hatch their chicks too fast, the chicks can die of shock.

Once Wolter's chicks are hatched and deemed strong enough, they are returned to their parents. The dummy egg is removed and the chick, under what looks like half an egg, is placed in the enclosure. The sound of its tapping stimulates the parents' instincts.

"They, theoretically, hatch it again," Wolter said.

"They don't recognize it as their own chick if they don't hatch it," said Neser, who has scars from ankle bites as souvenirs of his frequent visits to the breeding enclosure.

  1. Don't miss these Travel stories

    1. Hitch a ride to a snowbound cabin

      Some Northwest lodges and resorts are making winter adventures more accessible for families by throwing in a little help: Stocked cabins and burly snowcats.

    2. Do you know what to do in a plane crash?
    3. Untold riches amid hotels' lost and found items
    4. Photo of the day: Around the bend in Arizona
    5. Teen stopped at airport for gun replica on purse

Both parents share in building nests, hatching and feeding their young.

The conservationists must strike a delicate balance. If they wait too long to place the chick back with its real parents, it may become too dependent on humans to be released into the wild. If they move too soon, the chick may be too weak to survive with its parents.

Clumsy parents seeking to shelter chicks under their feet have crushed them. Some parents don't buy the elaborate charade of wooden eggs and half shells, and kill chicks they see as outsiders.

Still, a successful hatching seems easy compared to the larger challenges.

The conservationists' long-term goal is to re-establish viable breeding colonies in Namibia. But a strong threat is posed to the species there: cattle farmers who poison predators such as jackals to protect their cattle.

A common method is to leave a poisoned horse carcass out for jackals. Vultures swoop down on the carcass. One poisoned horse "can wipe out an entire colony," Neser said.

Members of vulture colonies fly together, watching the ground but also watching one another. If one swoops for food, others follow.

"They have this pretty cool network going for locating food," Neser said.

Wolter and Neser meet regularly with Namibian farmers, trying to persuade them to stop using poison. But conservationists acknowledge alternatives, such as bringing cattle into enclosures at night when predators strike, are expensive and labor intensive.

"The situation where we are is, no, it is not safe right now to reintroduce vultures into Namibia," Wolter said.

They plan to start slowly, reintroducing vultures into a Namibian nature reserve, though they realize it will be difficult to keep the birds from ranging far in search of food, and perhaps finding poisoned offerings.

"They can easily travel 300 kilometers (nearly 200 miles) to go and feed and come back in the same day," Neser said.

Vultures can fly into Namibia from South Africa. Poisoning is not as widespread in South Africa, but this country is more crowded and developed, creating other problems for the birds.

Good Samaritans regularly bring vultures to Wolter and Neser who have damaged their wings crashing into power lines. Those that can be rehabilitated are released back into the wild.

Some South Africans believe the birds are clairvoyant, and kill them to use their body parts for talismans.

In addition to welcoming visitors to their conservancy ? reservations are required ? Wolter and Neser travel regularly to schools to talk about their birds. They stress that though they might not be cute and cuddly, vultures are nature's safety and health agents. The birds clean up carcasses before they attract flies, feral dogs, rats and mice, and thereby check the spread of diseases like anthrax.

The Vulture Programme also offers paraglider trips for about $400 that allow researchers and the occasional special guest a chance to fly with the vultures.

Neser says shaking human prejudice isn't easy, and the future for vultures is "not really a very pretty or optimistic picture."

Wolter steps in: "The idea is to try and make a difference for as long as you can, and not give up."

If You Go...
VULTURE PROGRAMME: Located in Hartbeespoort, South Africa, about 50 miles (80 kilometers) from Johannesburg; http://www.vultureconservation.co.za/. The center is open to the public by appointment. Adults, $6.20 (50 South African rand); children, $2.50 (20 rand).

Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45571088/ns/travel-destination_travel/

neville heavy d heavy d taser gun patriots vs jets adventureland sean hannity

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

C. difficile lengthens hospital stays by 6 days

C. difficile lengthens hospital stays by 6 days [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 5-Dec-2011
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Kim Barnhardt
kim.barnhardt@cmaj.ca
613-520-7116 x2224
Canadian Medical Association Journal

A new study published in the CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) reports that hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection increases length of stay in hospital by an average of six days.

C. difficile is the most common cause of infectious diarrhea in hospital, and it is estimated that 10% of patients who become infected in hospital will die.

Researchers used The Ottawa Hospital Data Warehouse to analyze data on 136 877 admissions to The Ottawa Hospital between July 1, 2002 and March 31, 2009. A total of 1393 patients acquired C. difficile in hospital during this time, and these patients spent 34 days in hospital compared with 8 days for patients who did not have C. difficile. However, the researchers also found that patients who became infected with C. difficile tended to have more serious illnesses and would have been more likely to stay longer in hospital anyway. When the researchers controlled for the level of illness using a mathematical model, they found that hospital-acquired C. difficile increased the length of stay in hospital by six days.

"We believe our study provides the most accurate measure yet of the impact of hospital-acquired C. difficile on length of hospital stay," says lead author Dr. Alan Forster, a senior scientist at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and associate professor at the University of Ottawa. "C. difficile is a very serious problem for patients and for the health care system, however the good news is that tools such as The Ottawa Hospital Data Warehouse are providing us with more accurate information about C. difficile infection than we've ever had before, and this is helping us improve our infection-prevention efforts and also analyze their cost-effectiveness."

In a related commentary Dr. David Enoch, Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals, United Kingdom, and coauthor write that prevention and strict control measures are important for controlling the spread of the disease. "Adhering to basic evidence-based precautions can rapidly reduce the transmission of C. difficile and its associated mortality," they state. "Surveillance is essential to assess the efficacy of interventions."

###



[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


C. difficile lengthens hospital stays by 6 days [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 5-Dec-2011
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Kim Barnhardt
kim.barnhardt@cmaj.ca
613-520-7116 x2224
Canadian Medical Association Journal

A new study published in the CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) reports that hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection increases length of stay in hospital by an average of six days.

C. difficile is the most common cause of infectious diarrhea in hospital, and it is estimated that 10% of patients who become infected in hospital will die.

Researchers used The Ottawa Hospital Data Warehouse to analyze data on 136 877 admissions to The Ottawa Hospital between July 1, 2002 and March 31, 2009. A total of 1393 patients acquired C. difficile in hospital during this time, and these patients spent 34 days in hospital compared with 8 days for patients who did not have C. difficile. However, the researchers also found that patients who became infected with C. difficile tended to have more serious illnesses and would have been more likely to stay longer in hospital anyway. When the researchers controlled for the level of illness using a mathematical model, they found that hospital-acquired C. difficile increased the length of stay in hospital by six days.

"We believe our study provides the most accurate measure yet of the impact of hospital-acquired C. difficile on length of hospital stay," says lead author Dr. Alan Forster, a senior scientist at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and associate professor at the University of Ottawa. "C. difficile is a very serious problem for patients and for the health care system, however the good news is that tools such as The Ottawa Hospital Data Warehouse are providing us with more accurate information about C. difficile infection than we've ever had before, and this is helping us improve our infection-prevention efforts and also analyze their cost-effectiveness."

In a related commentary Dr. David Enoch, Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals, United Kingdom, and coauthor write that prevention and strict control measures are important for controlling the spread of the disease. "Adhering to basic evidence-based precautions can rapidly reduce the transmission of C. difficile and its associated mortality," they state. "Surveillance is essential to assess the efficacy of interventions."

###



[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Source: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-12/cmaj-cdl112911.php

big daddy patrice oneal lsu game lsu game animal house role models big ten championship game

Americans don't really want spending cuts (The Week)

New York ? Washington remains hyper-focused on slashing the deficit. But across the country, voters oppose even minor cuts to the feds' largest programs

The sound of metal on asphalt is becoming painfully familiar to many Americans. It's the sound of the can being kicked down the road by our feckless lawmakers. The latest can to be booted, of course, is that $1.2 trillion in debt reduction the super committee was supposed to have come up with by Thanksgiving. Now, supposedly, an automatic budget ax will drop in a year, cutting $600 billion from defense and $600 billion from domestic spending, most of the latter portion from Medicare.?

The less-than-surprising inability of the overhyped super committee to accomplish anything set off the usual snarky headlines and contemptuous utterances from the commentariat. Super failure, some sneered. Why can't our politicians do what the voters sent them to Washington to do??

SEE MORE: Can Obama save his jobs bill by splitting it up?

?

Many of the pundits have it wrong. Americans did not send their elected leaders to Washington to cut spending???at least not in a?meaningful way. And let's face it: The automatic cuts, at least as currently outlined, are unlikely to occur.?

Many of the pundits have it wrong. Americans did not send their elected leaders to Washington to cut spending ? at least not in a meaningful way.

SEE MORE: Should the GOP endorse Obama's payroll tax cut?

?

It's something of a paradox. Any truly meaningful debt reduction plan must include Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. Why? For the same reason criminals rob banks: It's where the money is. Entitlements today gobble 41 percent of federal spending, and with baby boomers beginning to retire and living longer, the cost of these programs will almost certainly become unsustainable. No serious deficit reduction is possible without including entitlements. This is a fact, which as John Adams was fond of saying, can be a stubborn thing.?

The politicians understand this. Entitlement reform has been addressed in every major deficit reduction plan put forth in recent years. Simpson-Bowles. Domenici-Rivlin. The Gang of Six. Three panels, three similar conclusions. (Since the super committee???thrown together in a hurry and politicized from day one ? issued no formal recommendations, I'm excluding it from this list.) So why hasn't there been meaningful entitlement reform??

SEE MORE: Why the GOP caved in the payroll tax fight: 4 theories

?

The bitter partisan divide between Republicans and Democrats is clearly a major culprit. We all know that. But the media keeps missing another reason, and it is this: Americans simply don't want meaningful cuts. To wit:

? March 3: "Americans across all age groups and ideologies said by large margins that it was 'unacceptable'?to make significant cuts in entitlement programs in order to reduce the federal deficit. Even tea party supporters, by a nearly 2-to-1 margin, declared significant cuts to Social Security 'unacceptable.'" (NBC-Wall Street Journal)?

SEE MORE: One cheer for the super committee failure

?

? April 20: "78 percent oppose cutting spending on Medicare as a way to chip away at the debt. On Medicaid ? the government insurance program for the poor ? 69 percent disapprove of cuts." (ABC-Washington Post)?

? And on July 21, with debt talks between the White House and Republican lawmakers dominating the headlines, a CNN poll said resistance to cuts was even greater, with 87 percent of Americans opposing Medicare cuts, and 84 percent Social Security.?

SEE MORE: Will the super committee 'save the economy' ? or wreck it?

?

Even after the once-unthinkable downgrade of U.S. government debt by Standard & Poor's, I've yet to see a survey any different than the above. A steady drumbeat of ominous warnings, images of rioting in debt-ravaged Greece???nothing seems to have gotten through. As Erskine Bowles, the Democratic half of President Obama's (largely ignored) deficit reduction commission has observed, America has to have "an adult conversation" about deficits. "The solutions," he warned, "are painful."?

SEE MORE: Budget countdown: Time to give up hope on the super committee?

?

Don't get me wrong. Americans understand we're up to our neck in debt. They know cuts have to be made. But this perception is often in the abstract, and when it comes to specifics, the classic NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) mentality rules. We just don't want anything cut that directly impacts us. This is why polls also show things like foreign aid are popular suggestions for cuts; most folks don't know that foreign aid is only about 1 percent of the budget. Another old saw: The triple bugaboo of "waste, fraud and abuse." No doubt there's money under the cushion here, but not nearly as much as folks think.?

Meantime, hard as it is to cut entitlements, what about the other half of the automatic budget ax ? defense? Surely that would be easier to cut, right? Perhaps not.?

SEE MORE: 6 people celebrating the super committee's collapse

?

Like the domestic cuts, slashing defense spending would occur through 2021 ? based on the ludicrous premise that the next four Congresses would leave the cuts intact. Next four Congresses? The cuts are unlikely to survive even the current one. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor is busy working on a deal to scale back Pentagon reductions, for example, in return for the Democrats getting an extension of both the payroll tax break and jobless benefits for the unemployed.?

The broader problem with automatic defense cuts ? aside from the impact on security, which is an important discussion on its own ? is the impact it would have on jobs. Wily defense contractors have been preparing for this moment for years, sprinkling jobs across all 50 states and most congressional districts, thus making it awfully hard for lawmakers to support cuts.?

SEE MORE: The super committee's 'epic' failure: What now?

?

Some states are particularly vulnerable to this clever form of extortion. Consider Cantor. His state, Virginia ? home to both the Pentagon and the world's largest naval base (Norfolk) ? is dependent on federal spending for 38 percent of its economy. George Mason University economist Steven Fuller recently told Congress that if the automatic ax were to fall, the state would lose 122,000 jobs. Only a third of these are actual defense jobs; Fuller says the other two-thirds would be jobs supported by defense paychecks: restaurants, shops, and so forth. This kind of job loss would erode Virginia's tax base, threatening its pristine AAA credit rating and designation (by CNBC) as the best state in the country in which to business.?

This is what you might call a dilemma for the anti-spending Cantor. And it's not just him: Fuller estimates more than a million jobs would be lost nationwide if the defense cuts went through. That's why many lawmakers are fighting them tooth and nail. ?

SEE MORE: Congress' 'wild final month': 5 predictions for December

?

Domestic spending, military spending: Do Americans really want their representatives in Washington to cut these in a meaningful way? Sure doesn't look that way. So when does the adult conversation begin?

View this article on TheWeek.com
Get The budget: Is the GOP's plan to cut $32 billion enough?

  • Opinion Brief: Is Obama's 2012 budget 'irrelevant?'
  • Opinion Brief: Is Obama too 'weak' to tackle the deficit?
  • Like on Facebook?-?Follow on Twitter?-?Sign-up for Daily Newsletter

    Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/oped/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/theweek/20111204/cm_theweek/222107

    sweet potato recipes green bean casserole recipe ryan braun karina smirnoff pumpkin cheesecake deviled eggs pie crust

    Monday, December 5, 2011

    AP Classes: Absolutely Preposterous Weapons Of Mass Instruction

    This is a teen-written article from our friends at Teenink.com.

    Weapons of Mass Instruction have been discovered in schools nationwide. Standardization of education is a plague that comes in many forms but none as detrimental as the AP class.

    AP, or Advanced Placement, enrollment supposedly signifies that a ?student is intelligent enough to take college-level courses in high school. In reality, it?s just Academic Pollution. You do not learn the material to become enlightened. You learn to pass a test. You learn so that you can impress ?admissions officers with your weighted GPA. You learn so that when you enter college as a sophomore, you can fast-track your way to a high-paying job and the ?real world.? But signing away your childhood to the College Board is Absolutely Preposterous.

    Dealing with those gifted children who actually want to be educated often presents a challenge to administrators. Easily bored in classes that don?t stimulate them, these students release their pent-up frustration at their intellectual stagnation in the form of classroom disruptions. The solution? Lump all the Annoying Prodigies into one class and teach them the higher-level material they crave.

    However, this isolation only creates further problems: Students are stratified into two spheres of existence. Like oil and water, these groups rarely mix or interact, resulting in an unmotivated class of slackers and a bunch of Antisocial Puppets, neither group knowing how to deal with the other. School should develop students socially as well as academically, preparing them to coexist with people from all walks in this rapidly changing world.

    The fundamental rule in AP classes is Avoid People. Who has time for distracting social engagements? The massive homework load, looming deadlines and supplementary study groups slowly suck up your week.

    Life doesn?t exist outside of meaningless busywork. Most often this ?consists of Absentminded Prattle, or the art of explaining concepts that you don?t understand, care about, or ever really need. The essay is no longer a forum for sharing opinions or arguing a case; it?s a formulaic regurgitation of exactly what the teacher/grader/counselor wants to hear. Anything Pedantic scores very well. Dick and Jane don?t play ball; Dick and Jane ?violently propel spherical objects at each other?s cranial cavities.

    Weekends are for Application Padding: community service, multiple musical instruments, perhaps a sport or two, and other such ?educational experiences.? Only Approved Pastimes are permissible. If a college wouldn?t care, neither should you.

    Aggressive Parents enhance the whole experience with constant poking and pushing: ?Do more, do it better, and do it faster than everyone around you. Don?t slack off. Don?t you want get into college?? Flipping burgers at McDonald?s is a favorite all-purpose threat, as if no respectable place of ?employment accepts applications from students who can?t name all the Chinese dynasties or integrate complex polynomials. Applying Pressure is a parental specialty, ?although the constant in-class reminders about judgment day (a.k.a. the AP test) don?t do anything to alleviate the stress.

    Abandon Principles and accept it; shape yourself to fit the College Board cookie-cutter. AP is not learning but memorizing and rewording when prompted. AP is Always Procrastinating, staying up until one to finish that paper due tomorrow or the last of those French conjugations. AP is an obstacle course with never-ending hoops to jump through. AP is being taught ?exactly what to think and how to think it. At the end of the year, they evaluate on how well you regurgitate.

    And so we sit in our little box, ?swallowing unquestioningly and vomiting on command, waiting for the sweet freedom that college brings. But can we survive the blinding sun of ?individual opinion? Or are we Altered Permanently to obey?

    - Sophie W., San Diego, CA

    This piece has also been published in Teen Ink's monthly print magazine.

    '; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });

    Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/03/ap-absolutely-preposterou_n_1127539.html

    dorothy rodham rick hendrick plane crash marco rubio marco rubio no shave november kevin durant miranda lambert